Wikileaks commentary generally accurate

I'd say that Daniel Serwer's commentary is generally accurate (RE: "A diplomat's guide to reading Wikileaks," Oct. 6 online daily update)—although I'd give more credibility to the accuracy of the material reported. Our interpreters are good, our own language skills are more than adequate, the English ability of those with whom we are speaking is often outstanding—and many of our key "interlocutors" are native English speakers also.

Published: Wednesday, 10/19/2011 12:00 am EDT

I'd say that Daniel Serwer's commentary is generally accurate (RE: "A diplomat's guide to reading Wikileaks," Oct. 6 online daily update)—although I'd give more credibility to the accuracy of the material reported. Our interpreters are good, our own language skills are more than adequate, the English ability of those with whom we are speaking is often outstanding—and many of our key "interlocutors" are native English speakers also.

If you are already a subscriber

Subscribe to Embassy

Subscribe to the print and electronic editions and get instant access to Embassy online.


Quick purchase

Purchase this week's edition of Embassy in electronic format (PDF) for $4.00


Sign up for a free trial

For access to the website.



This Week's Issue
policy briefings